<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guest Editorial: An analysis of Republican hypocrisy—Ronald Reagan and beyond</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.schillingshow.com/2010/03/16/guest-editorial-an-analysis-of-republican-hypocrisy-%e2%80%94-ronald-reagan-and-beyond/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.schillingshow.com/2010/03/16/guest-editorial-an-analysis-of-republican-hypocrisy-%e2%80%94-ronald-reagan-and-beyond/</link>
	<description>Where the News is Made!™ (online)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 00:46:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wink</title>
		<link>http://www.schillingshow.com/2010/03/16/guest-editorial-an-analysis-of-republican-hypocrisy-%e2%80%94-ronald-reagan-and-beyond/comment-page-1/#comment-617</link>
		<dc:creator>Wink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 18:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.schillingshow.com/?p=2462#comment-617</guid>
		<description>While I find myself nodding in agreement with the author, the charts and graphs don&#039;t portray our new level of excessive government spending (enacted and proposed) in a particularly viable fashion.

A more entertaining (and still illustrative) You Tube clip about the national debt can be found here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5yxFtTwDcc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I find myself nodding in agreement with the author, the charts and graphs don&#8217;t portray our new level of excessive government spending (enacted and proposed) in a particularly viable fashion.</p>
<p>A more entertaining (and still illustrative) You Tube clip about the national debt can be found here:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5yxFtTwDcc" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5yxFtTwDcc</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.schillingshow.com/2010/03/16/guest-editorial-an-analysis-of-republican-hypocrisy-%e2%80%94-ronald-reagan-and-beyond/comment-page-1/#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.schillingshow.com/?p=2462#comment-608</guid>
		<description>James Curtis has presented a modern history of spending
and accounting in the United States.  As a general point,
it has always been that conservative Republican spending
and taxation are good because they are good people,
Christian people.  On the other hand, &quot;left-wing,
San Francisco&quot;, Democrats&#039; spending and taxation are
bad.  I left out the expletives about the Democrats.
If you travel in conservative, Republican circles, I
assume you have heard them.  Will this spending through
borrowing and taxation ever decline on the federal level?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James Curtis has presented a modern history of spending<br />
and accounting in the United States.  As a general point,<br />
it has always been that conservative Republican spending<br />
and taxation are good because they are good people,<br />
Christian people.  On the other hand, &#8220;left-wing,<br />
San Francisco&#8221;, Democrats&#8217; spending and taxation are<br />
bad.  I left out the expletives about the Democrats.<br />
If you travel in conservative, Republican circles, I<br />
assume you have heard them.  Will this spending through<br />
borrowing and taxation ever decline on the federal level?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

