<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thorpe speaks: Perriello taken to the woodshed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.schillingshow.com/2010/08/06/thorpe-speaks-perriello-taken-to-the-woodshed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.schillingshow.com/2010/08/06/thorpe-speaks-perriello-taken-to-the-woodshed/</link>
	<description>Where the News is Made!™ (online)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 00:46:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.schillingshow.com/2010/08/06/thorpe-speaks-perriello-taken-to-the-woodshed/comment-page-1/#comment-772</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.schillingshow.com/?p=3451#comment-772</guid>
		<description>It is possible to be pro-life and yet to believe the abortion question has been settled legally. One of the saddest things about the Religious Right is its notion that people who don&#039;t share its politics by definition aren&#039;t God-fearing. And until you folks grow beyond that, you might win a political battle here or there, but you won&#039;t &quot;take back&quot; &lt;i&gt;our&lt;/i&gt; mutually shared (not &lt;i&gt;your&lt;/i&gt; own) country. Love your neighbors enough to see the good in them, and they might be open to persuasion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is possible to be pro-life and yet to believe the abortion question has been settled legally. One of the saddest things about the Religious Right is its notion that people who don&#8217;t share its politics by definition aren&#8217;t God-fearing. And until you folks grow beyond that, you might win a political battle here or there, but you won&#8217;t &#8220;take back&#8221; <i>our</i> mutually shared (not <i>your</i> own) country. Love your neighbors enough to see the good in them, and they might be open to persuasion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teresa</title>
		<link>http://www.schillingshow.com/2010/08/06/thorpe-speaks-perriello-taken-to-the-woodshed/comment-page-1/#comment-770</link>
		<dc:creator>Teresa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 06:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.schillingshow.com/?p=3451#comment-770</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Carole, for your unerring, well reasoned remarks. Yes indeed, it is time for America to wake up and purge the halls of Congress &quot;of every corrupt, arrogant, hypocritical, incompetent, lying weasel that scurries through its halls and plots to &#039;fundamentally transform&#039; our great country.&quot;   

Let the good, honest, God fearing, well reasoned citizens of Virginia&#039;s 5th district lead the way to take back our great country this November by defeating pitiful Tom Perriello and his like-minded comrades!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Carole, for your unerring, well reasoned remarks. Yes indeed, it is time for America to wake up and purge the halls of Congress &#8220;of every corrupt, arrogant, hypocritical, incompetent, lying weasel that scurries through its halls and plots to &#8216;fundamentally transform&#8217; our great country.&#8221;   </p>
<p>Let the good, honest, God fearing, well reasoned citizens of Virginia&#8217;s 5th district lead the way to take back our great country this November by defeating pitiful Tom Perriello and his like-minded comrades!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.schillingshow.com/2010/08/06/thorpe-speaks-perriello-taken-to-the-woodshed/comment-page-1/#comment-769</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 14:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.schillingshow.com/?p=3451#comment-769</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s one thing to stand for fiscal conservatism and limited governmen, but this speech is poorly reasoned when it&#039;s reasoned at all, and typifies Tea Party rhetoric in that it&#039;s both nutty and nasty. 
 
Perriello, we read, is &quot;an obedient pup,&quot; a corrupt, arrogant, hypocritical, incompetent, lying weasel (but all due respect to him! -- we get along!) who votes whichever way Pelosi wants him to. But where is the evidence that he doesn&#039;t honestly share her positions? The stimulus bill (that many conservative economists) supported &quot;failed miserably both nationally and in Virginia.&quot; But how do we know the economy would have rebounded without it? And how do we know economists who think it needed to be larger to succeed are wrong? 
 
&lt;i&gt;Contrary to Tom’s protestations, why else would the Obama administration risk political egg on its face by issuing an unnecessary a new regulation via Secretary Sebelius?&lt;/i&gt;
 
Never mind that &quot;else&quot; and &quot;unnecessary&quot; cancel each other out here. The point not acknowledged is that that the new regulation shows Obama is serious about keeping his promise not to federally fund abortions. 
 
&lt;i&gt;Tom said of himself and of Congress: “If you don’t tie our hands, we will keep stealing.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
 
Given that moments before he had called stealing a problem and referred to Congress as &quot;they&quot; instead of &quot;we,&quot; it&#039;s clear he&#039;s not admitting anything, but not really even talking about himself. It&#039;s as if a law-abiding man in a family full of crooks had said, &quot;our family has often had trouble with the law,&quot; and you said, &quot;see, he admits he&#039;s a criminal.&quot; 
 
And his approval rating is not 11 percent, of course. He is not Congress, and neither is Pelosi, and the body that has received that rating as a whole includes many conservatives disliked by Democratic and Independent voters represented in that poll. Of course the writer must know this, but never mind, don&#039;t let facts get in the way of a good excoriation. 
 
But of course Thorpe&#039;s mad, because -- here&#039;s the nutty part -- conspiring liberals want not only to saddle their own kids with huge debt, but to seize &quot;unlimited&quot; power on behalf of government, annihilating personal liberty. Which is an unconscionable thing to do. Except when it restricts abortion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s one thing to stand for fiscal conservatism and limited governmen, but this speech is poorly reasoned when it&#8217;s reasoned at all, and typifies Tea Party rhetoric in that it&#8217;s both nutty and nasty. </p>
<p>Perriello, we read, is &#8220;an obedient pup,&#8221; a corrupt, arrogant, hypocritical, incompetent, lying weasel (but all due respect to him! &#8212; we get along!) who votes whichever way Pelosi wants him to. But where is the evidence that he doesn&#8217;t honestly share her positions? The stimulus bill (that many conservative economists) supported &#8220;failed miserably both nationally and in Virginia.&#8221; But how do we know the economy would have rebounded without it? And how do we know economists who think it needed to be larger to succeed are wrong? </p>
<p><i>Contrary to Tom’s protestations, why else would the Obama administration risk political egg on its face by issuing an unnecessary a new regulation via Secretary Sebelius?</i></p>
<p>Never mind that &#8220;else&#8221; and &#8220;unnecessary&#8221; cancel each other out here. The point not acknowledged is that that the new regulation shows Obama is serious about keeping his promise not to federally fund abortions. </p>
<p><i>Tom said of himself and of Congress: “If you don’t tie our hands, we will keep stealing.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Given that moments before he had called stealing a problem and referred to Congress as &#8220;they&#8221; instead of &#8220;we,&#8221; it&#8217;s clear he&#8217;s not admitting anything, but not really even talking about himself. It&#8217;s as if a law-abiding man in a family full of crooks had said, &#8220;our family has often had trouble with the law,&#8221; and you said, &#8220;see, he admits he&#8217;s a criminal.&#8221; </p>
<p>And his approval rating is not 11 percent, of course. He is not Congress, and neither is Pelosi, and the body that has received that rating as a whole includes many conservatives disliked by Democratic and Independent voters represented in that poll. Of course the writer must know this, but never mind, don&#8217;t let facts get in the way of a good excoriation. </p>
<p>But of course Thorpe&#8217;s mad, because &#8212; here&#8217;s the nutty part &#8212; conspiring liberals want not only to saddle their own kids with huge debt, but to seize &#8220;unlimited&#8221; power on behalf of government, annihilating personal liberty. Which is an unconscionable thing to do. Except when it restricts abortion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

